Cursor Code Audit

A Cursor code audit is an independent technical review of an application built with Cursor's AI editor and agent. Vibecop reviews the code produced across many agent sessions — security, architecture, data handling and consistency — and reports where large accepted diffs introduced risk that review inside the editor did not catch.

What does a Cursor code audit check?

  • Large accepted diffs

    Multi-file agent changes that were approved in bulk, re-read line by line.

  • Pattern consistency

    Competing conventions introduced across sessions with different context in the window.

  • Rules coverage

    Whether project rules encode the constraints that actually matter, and where generated code ignores them.

  • Context gaps

    Code written against a partial view of the repo, duplicating logic that already existed elsewhere.

  • Access control

    Server-side authorization on every route, including ones added late in a session.

  • Secrets

    Keys in env files, client bundles, and anything committed during rapid iteration.

  • Dependencies

    Packages added by the agent, their CVEs, and the ones now unused.

  • Database access

    Query patterns, missing indexes, migrations, and constraints skipped for speed.

  • Input validation

    Boundary validation on API routes and server actions.

  • Error handling

    Generated try/catch blocks that log and continue as if nothing failed.

  • Type safety

    Suppressed errors, `any` escapes, and types that no longer match the data.

  • Dead code

    Superseded implementations left in the tree after a later session solved it differently.

  • Test reality

    Whether generated tests assert behaviour or simply mirror the implementation.

  • Performance

    Request-path work, N+1 access, and payloads that only look fine locally.

  • Production readiness

    Deployment, monitoring, backups, and rollback for the system as built.

See how an audit runs

Build with
confidence.

AI builds the product. Vibecop makes sure it won’t break in production, fail under scale, or expose your users to risk. One audit. Fewer expensive surprises.